For a lot of people, I think the challenge with being vegan comes not from food choices but life choices. What do you wear? This may sound like a stupid question, to some. Just wear cotton shirts and jeans; don't wear leather, wool, or silk. There, dilemma averted. It's really not that simple, though. Yes, don't wear leather, wool, or silk. Just like with food, however, other animal parts and fluids find their way into the fashion industry through products besides leather, wool, and silk.
The biggest problem is shoes. Finding vegan shoes can be a daunting task for a lot of people. Even if you manage to avoid leather, you are still dealing with potential glues made from animals and then there is the issue of sustainability. How were these shoes made? What was the impact on the environment? Was a sweatshop used? There are so many questions to ask. There is one, however, that never needs asking: do I have to sacrifice fashion for compassion? No, you don't.
There are a lot of great brands that have vegan and sustainable lines. So, if you're interested in How To Find Fashionable Vegan Shoes, follow me.
The article above, courtesy of One Green Planet, lists international shoe sellers. There are lines from London, the UK, Portugal, and Brazil. If, like me, you would like to stay a tad bit closer to home and/or don't want to have to deal with the dollars pathetic translation, there are great options in the states. In New York, there is a place called MooShoes. It is kind of like a one-stop-shop for vegan shoes. I recommend the sale section, unless you're used to spending $100+ on a pair of shoes. Follow your heart.
If you want something more readily available where you are, I recommend olsen Haus. Now, I know what you're saying... these are still pretty expensive. I know that. Here's the thing. Shoes get a lot of use; a lot of wear and tear. These are quality shoes made from quality materials manufactured in a sustainable, reusable way. These aren't Old Navy's $2 flip-flops. For something more affordable, check out TOMS vegan line. Out of everything you wear, shoes are one thing you definitely shouldn't cheap out on. They protect your feet and endure the most abuse.
Check out the One Green Planet article and the next time you're out buying shoes, think about what they're made out of, how long they will last, and if it's really worth what you're paying.
Showing posts with label vegan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vegan. Show all posts
Saturday, July 9, 2011
Monday, June 27, 2011
Justin Has Stolen My Heart
| Image from here. |
Then I picked up the jar and nervously turned it over to examine the ingredient list. Dairy-free. The heavens opened up and angels sang and Republicans and Democrats embraced in the streets and nothing hurt. I had found it.
Justin's has chocolate almond, peanut, and hazelnut butter. Honey almond, and peanut butter. Regular peanut and almond butter. And maple almond butter. Plus dark chocolate and milk chocolate peanut butter cups. The milk chocolate peanut butter cups are not vegan, as well as the honey products. Everything else is vegan! Exciting, yeah? I know. Personally, I've never liked honey so there is no loss there, for me, and I've always preferred dark chocolate.
It is all sustainably harvested and green and something you can feel good about. Is it expensive? I suppose it could be classified as such. Let's remember, though, that we're looking at quality, here. It's not like this is an apple or something that you would have all in one sitting; it's something that is meant to last for a while.
Also, it comes in little individual squeeze packages. For a student who spends all day in a classroom listening to the smooth stylings of Chaucer, translating middle-English, this is paramount. You can find Justin's at specialty stores, Safeway, and Raley's -- that I know of. The website also has a store-locater as these websites to tend to have. And as always, you can buy it online if you really needed to.
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Feel Better?
For those of you who follow me on twitter, you may have noticed that yesterday I retweeted one article multiple times from different sources. That was deliberate, I can assure you. It was on "Humane Meat." The article was written by Nil Zacharias, co-founder of One Green Planet. You can follow them on twitter, as well. The article is called Humane Meat Is The Solution To What, Again?
As a vegetarian working on the transition into veganism, I have often pondered this question. I have had discussions with people and sometimes, I've been roped into arguments about it. Bottom line is: people don't like to think about where their food comes from and making it seem like it comes from at least marginally happy animals makes them feel better. Zacharias explores the ideas that buzz words and phrases like "free-range" and "humane" are used to ease the consciouses of the people buying the products; people who know what's going on in factory farms but don't care might be sociopaths; and a lot of people just don't want to know.
A friend of mine asked me why I don't just eat the meat from organic farmers where you know the animals were allowed to graze and were taken care of. This bothered me for two specific reasons and then a number of less definable reasons.
Number one: I don't want to eat meat. Period. I do not agree with the practices employed by CAFO's; however, I wouldn't eat meat from anywhere because I am not okay with eating the flesh or byproducts of another animal regardless of where it came from. True, grass-finished organic meat is vastly better for you than CAFO meat because it does not have all of the antibiotics and hormones injected into it and it grazes instead of being fed corn and God only knows what else. If you are dead set on eating meat, you should get it from these places instead of supporting the practices of factory farming. I, however, do not eat meat, do not want to eat meat, and will not eat meat, therefore, the topic is moot.
Number two: he tends to try and pressure me out of vegetarianism/veganism. When I asked him why he is always on my case about it, he told me it is because he feels pressured. I never try and convert anyone or preach to them. When people ask me something, I answer them. When he wants to know things, I tell him. When he asks me my reasons, I tell him. From what I've heard and read, this is common among a lot of omnivores; they feel threatened or pressured or judged solely by the veg-lifestyle. I can understand that. It also supports the idea that "humane meat" makes them feel better. If they buy this "humane meat" they can't be judged because they are looking out for the animals.
Here's the thing... what this entire things really comes down to is giving an abused animal an extra few inches of space doesn't really constitute as humane behavior. Even if they figure out how to slaughter the animals in a more "humane" way, the fact of the matter is that these animals -- living breathing creatures that can feel pain and be scared -- are still being killed and treated as things; as a commodity. This is because of supply and demand.
People are demanding animal products at a startling rate. As a result, the environment is suffering, people are getting exponentially unhealthier, and more and more animals are being raised for slaughter in order to meet the meat demand. If everyone cut down on their animal consumption, the demand for it would lower so much that fewer animals would be raised for slaughter -- this would be reflected in peoples health and the environment, also. The numbers are in and people want animal products. The companies see the demand and supply it as quickly and efficiently for them as possible. What all of this means, and the article talks about, is that everyone needs to work on being a conscious consumer. Think about where the stuff you're buying comes from and what had to be done to get it and if stamping the word "humane" on the label makes the situation better or if it just makes you feel better.
Since the above incident, my friend has expressed to me a desire to go "a little veg" as he calls it. He says he can't imagine not eating meat but he wants to be healthier. I told him I would help him, if he wanted.
As a vegetarian working on the transition into veganism, I have often pondered this question. I have had discussions with people and sometimes, I've been roped into arguments about it. Bottom line is: people don't like to think about where their food comes from and making it seem like it comes from at least marginally happy animals makes them feel better. Zacharias explores the ideas that buzz words and phrases like "free-range" and "humane" are used to ease the consciouses of the people buying the products; people who know what's going on in factory farms but don't care might be sociopaths; and a lot of people just don't want to know.
A friend of mine asked me why I don't just eat the meat from organic farmers where you know the animals were allowed to graze and were taken care of. This bothered me for two specific reasons and then a number of less definable reasons.
Number one: I don't want to eat meat. Period. I do not agree with the practices employed by CAFO's; however, I wouldn't eat meat from anywhere because I am not okay with eating the flesh or byproducts of another animal regardless of where it came from. True, grass-finished organic meat is vastly better for you than CAFO meat because it does not have all of the antibiotics and hormones injected into it and it grazes instead of being fed corn and God only knows what else. If you are dead set on eating meat, you should get it from these places instead of supporting the practices of factory farming. I, however, do not eat meat, do not want to eat meat, and will not eat meat, therefore, the topic is moot.
Number two: he tends to try and pressure me out of vegetarianism/veganism. When I asked him why he is always on my case about it, he told me it is because he feels pressured. I never try and convert anyone or preach to them. When people ask me something, I answer them. When he wants to know things, I tell him. When he asks me my reasons, I tell him. From what I've heard and read, this is common among a lot of omnivores; they feel threatened or pressured or judged solely by the veg-lifestyle. I can understand that. It also supports the idea that "humane meat" makes them feel better. If they buy this "humane meat" they can't be judged because they are looking out for the animals.
Here's the thing... what this entire things really comes down to is giving an abused animal an extra few inches of space doesn't really constitute as humane behavior. Even if they figure out how to slaughter the animals in a more "humane" way, the fact of the matter is that these animals -- living breathing creatures that can feel pain and be scared -- are still being killed and treated as things; as a commodity. This is because of supply and demand.
People are demanding animal products at a startling rate. As a result, the environment is suffering, people are getting exponentially unhealthier, and more and more animals are being raised for slaughter in order to meet the meat demand. If everyone cut down on their animal consumption, the demand for it would lower so much that fewer animals would be raised for slaughter -- this would be reflected in peoples health and the environment, also. The numbers are in and people want animal products. The companies see the demand and supply it as quickly and efficiently for them as possible. What all of this means, and the article talks about, is that everyone needs to work on being a conscious consumer. Think about where the stuff you're buying comes from and what had to be done to get it and if stamping the word "humane" on the label makes the situation better or if it just makes you feel better.
Since the above incident, my friend has expressed to me a desire to go "a little veg" as he calls it. He says he can't imagine not eating meat but he wants to be healthier. I told him I would help him, if he wanted.
Thursday, June 16, 2011
GMO: From Plants to Meat to People
Last quarter, for my women's studies class, we were split up into groups and each group was assigned a book to read and present on. My group was assigned Animal, Vegetable, Miracle by Barbara Kingsolver. The book chronicled her and her families journey through a year of food. They vowed to eat only local foods in order to limit their impact on the environment and be pesticide free.
For my section of the project, I talked about genetic modification and how that relates to not only food -- as was discussed in the book -- but also people which related it back to the class; Women's Health.
Today's entry will be my section of our report. Enjoy.
GENETIC MODIFICATION: FROM PLANTS TO MEAT TO PEOPLE
When Barbara Kingsolver, her husband Steven, and their family decided they wanted to embark on a year long journey to abstain from processed, out of season foods and only eat local and organic food -- much of which they grew themselves on their farm -- they agreed to forego genetically modified foods. Genetic modification (GM) is the "direct manipulation of genes spliced into the chromosomes of plants, and vice versa" (47). Genetically modified crops serve many purposes; they can grow faster and allow crops to grow out of season. This allows people to eat the same produce all year round. Apples, for instance, which are in season in Fall and Winter, are always available in grocery stores. Strawberries, a summer berry, can also be purchased all year -- albeit at astronomical prices. Bananas, which are not even grown in the United States, too, can be purchased any given day, all over the country. Genetically modifying these crops allows the grower to grow them during times of the year when they are not in season and also expands their shelf life so the produce can travel long distances to get to the consumer -- bananas, for example, are trucked up from Mexico. In her book, Animal, Vegetable, Mineral, Barbara explains the detrimental effects of transporting food over long distances: carbon emissions, gasoline, etc.
Genetic modification, however, primarily benefits the large companies who own the patent to the genetic mutation: "The ultimate unnatural product of genetic engineering is a 'terminator gene' that causes a crop to commit genetic suicide after one generation" (47). This allows the company who owns the patent to the seeds to prevent the farmer from saving seeds and using them in another harvest; by forcing the farmers to buy more seeds every harvest, the companies make more money. The terminator gene offers no nutritional benefit to the crop, and in turn, the consumer. The opposite of genetically modified seeds/crops, are heirloom seeds/crops. These are seeds that are in their natural form. These open-pollinated heirlooms are collected by farmers like jewels. They behave the same way natural selection does; the crops best attributes are reproduced in subsequent generations. In the book, Barbara talks about heirloom vegetables and how important they are to farmers. Unlike seeds with the terminator gene, these seeds can be saved from the fruit of one crop to be used in the next season and can continue indefinitely.
Plants, however, are not the only genetically modified food being produced. CAFO, or Factory Farms, account for a majority of the meat consumed in the United States. CAFO stands for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations and make up approximately 15% of all AFO's -- CAFO's are AFO's that meet certain EPA criteria. The EPA.gov (for the actual link, check the References section) site defines AFO's as "agricultural operations where animals are kept and raised in confined situations. AFO's congregate animals, feed, manure and urine, dead animals, and production operations on a small land area. Feed is brought to the animals rather than the animals seeing feed in pastures, fields, or on rangeland." CAFO meat is dramatically different from free-range and grass finished meat. The CAFO animals themselves are dramatically overweight and are pumped full of hormones and antibiotics. These additives carry over into the meat that people consume, effecting human health.
In the informational essays Steven Hopp includes in Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, he discusses the complaints of opponents of CAFO have:
In order to keep the animals docile, traits like intelligence and the ability to reproduce naturally have been bred out -- Barbara notes that a friend told her that she has seen turkeys drown because they looked up when it was raining. The animals are unable to reproduce naturally because their legs are not strong enough to hold up their unnaturally giant bodies and the instincts that would encourage them to mate have been suppressed. All industrialized turkeys -- CAFO -- are artificially inseminated, given growth hormones and antibiotics, and do not live to be a year old. Cows are sent from farmers to the factory farms when they are only a few months old and then immediately fattened up for slaughter.
CAFO came into existence as part of the switch from naturally based farming to a highly mechanized production system that utilizes genetic modification as well as synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. This is in stark contrast to the family run organic farms that Barbara and her family frequent. U.S. farmers now produce 3,900 calories per citizen, per day (twice the amount the human body needs and 700 more calories than were being grown in 1980).
In response to the increased amount of calories being produced, the food industry found ways to get those extra 700 calories in to the bodies of people who may not want them. The most genetically modified crops -- and the ones that make up for most of those forced 700 calories -- are corn and soybeans. Corn is especially prominent in everything from high-fructose corn syrup to packaging materials (contains cornstarch). Soybeans, as well, have found their way to imitating animal flesh and/or fall under the category of "added fats."
Serving sizes and packaging have grown to accommodate the excess calories. The Coke bottle, for example, went from 8 oz. to 20oz. "U.S. consumption of 'added fats' has increased one-third since 1975, and our HFCS is up by 1000 percent" (14). Due to evolving in "lean environments," humans have a genetic weakness for fats and sugars. Although they may not be familiar with the science, the food companies hire strategists to figure out how to market the calorie surplus to people. Kids are the primary demographic, "food companies spend over $10 billion a year selling food brands to kids, and it isn't broccoli they're pushing" (15). This is similar to how cigarettes are often pushed on kids. As a result, the waistlines of Americans are growing. Diet trends are rampant as well as plastic surgery. Just as we modify our food, we modify ourselves.
Not only does the lower nutrition in GM food impact our health, -- obesity, heart disease, high cholesterol, etc. -- it also affects our body image. Elayne A. Saltzberg and Joan C. Chrisler, in their article "Beauty Is the Beast: Psychological Effects of the Pursuit of the Perfect Female Body," examine how body image has changed over the years and how people augment their bodies to fit the contemporary idea of beauty.
"Woe is us, we over fed, undernourished U.S. citizens" (54).
I hope that was educational. My interest in environmental issues and animal welfare issues can all be traced back to my eating habits and my concern for my health. The way we eat and what we eat directly impacts the environment and the lives of others.
Think about it. Oh, and sign the petition at the bottom of my blog.
For my section of the project, I talked about genetic modification and how that relates to not only food -- as was discussed in the book -- but also people which related it back to the class; Women's Health.
Today's entry will be my section of our report. Enjoy.
GENETIC MODIFICATION: FROM PLANTS TO MEAT TO PEOPLE
When Barbara Kingsolver, her husband Steven, and their family decided they wanted to embark on a year long journey to abstain from processed, out of season foods and only eat local and organic food -- much of which they grew themselves on their farm -- they agreed to forego genetically modified foods. Genetic modification (GM) is the "direct manipulation of genes spliced into the chromosomes of plants, and vice versa" (47). Genetically modified crops serve many purposes; they can grow faster and allow crops to grow out of season. This allows people to eat the same produce all year round. Apples, for instance, which are in season in Fall and Winter, are always available in grocery stores. Strawberries, a summer berry, can also be purchased all year -- albeit at astronomical prices. Bananas, which are not even grown in the United States, too, can be purchased any given day, all over the country. Genetically modifying these crops allows the grower to grow them during times of the year when they are not in season and also expands their shelf life so the produce can travel long distances to get to the consumer -- bananas, for example, are trucked up from Mexico. In her book, Animal, Vegetable, Mineral, Barbara explains the detrimental effects of transporting food over long distances: carbon emissions, gasoline, etc.
Genetic modification, however, primarily benefits the large companies who own the patent to the genetic mutation: "The ultimate unnatural product of genetic engineering is a 'terminator gene' that causes a crop to commit genetic suicide after one generation" (47). This allows the company who owns the patent to the seeds to prevent the farmer from saving seeds and using them in another harvest; by forcing the farmers to buy more seeds every harvest, the companies make more money. The terminator gene offers no nutritional benefit to the crop, and in turn, the consumer. The opposite of genetically modified seeds/crops, are heirloom seeds/crops. These are seeds that are in their natural form. These open-pollinated heirlooms are collected by farmers like jewels. They behave the same way natural selection does; the crops best attributes are reproduced in subsequent generations. In the book, Barbara talks about heirloom vegetables and how important they are to farmers. Unlike seeds with the terminator gene, these seeds can be saved from the fruit of one crop to be used in the next season and can continue indefinitely.
Plants, however, are not the only genetically modified food being produced. CAFO, or Factory Farms, account for a majority of the meat consumed in the United States. CAFO stands for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations and make up approximately 15% of all AFO's -- CAFO's are AFO's that meet certain EPA criteria. The EPA.gov (for the actual link, check the References section) site defines AFO's as "agricultural operations where animals are kept and raised in confined situations. AFO's congregate animals, feed, manure and urine, dead animals, and production operations on a small land area. Feed is brought to the animals rather than the animals seeing feed in pastures, fields, or on rangeland." CAFO meat is dramatically different from free-range and grass finished meat. The CAFO animals themselves are dramatically overweight and are pumped full of hormones and antibiotics. These additives carry over into the meat that people consume, effecting human health.
In the informational essays Steven Hopp includes in Animal, Vegetable, Miracle, he discusses the complaints of opponents of CAFO have:
- The treatment of CAFO animals: the animals are packed tightly -- often unable to turn around. According to Steve, a six-foot-by-eight-foot room can house 1,152 chickens.
- Pollution: putting so many animals in a small space produces huge volumes of excrement, creating waste storage and water quality problems. "CAFO animals in the United States produce about six times the volume of fecal matter of all humans on our planet. Animals on pasture, by contrast, enrich the soil" (91). The water and soil become toxic which affects the crops that come in contact with the contaminated soil and water.
- Health: confined animals are stressed and given antibiotics to ward off disease. "Nearly three-quarters of all antibiotics in the United States are used in CAFO's" (91). The problem with antibiotics is that the bacteria become resistant to the antibiotics -- the antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria that grow in CAFO conditions are a significant new threat to humans (91). In addition, the CAFO animals are all being fed corn -- even the fish -- which they are not evolved to eat, compromising their immune system and in turn creating strains of viruses that would not be present if the animals were being fed what they are evolved to eat.
In order to keep the animals docile, traits like intelligence and the ability to reproduce naturally have been bred out -- Barbara notes that a friend told her that she has seen turkeys drown because they looked up when it was raining. The animals are unable to reproduce naturally because their legs are not strong enough to hold up their unnaturally giant bodies and the instincts that would encourage them to mate have been suppressed. All industrialized turkeys -- CAFO -- are artificially inseminated, given growth hormones and antibiotics, and do not live to be a year old. Cows are sent from farmers to the factory farms when they are only a few months old and then immediately fattened up for slaughter.
CAFO came into existence as part of the switch from naturally based farming to a highly mechanized production system that utilizes genetic modification as well as synthetic pesticides and fertilizers. This is in stark contrast to the family run organic farms that Barbara and her family frequent. U.S. farmers now produce 3,900 calories per citizen, per day (twice the amount the human body needs and 700 more calories than were being grown in 1980).
In response to the increased amount of calories being produced, the food industry found ways to get those extra 700 calories in to the bodies of people who may not want them. The most genetically modified crops -- and the ones that make up for most of those forced 700 calories -- are corn and soybeans. Corn is especially prominent in everything from high-fructose corn syrup to packaging materials (contains cornstarch). Soybeans, as well, have found their way to imitating animal flesh and/or fall under the category of "added fats."
Serving sizes and packaging have grown to accommodate the excess calories. The Coke bottle, for example, went from 8 oz. to 20oz. "U.S. consumption of 'added fats' has increased one-third since 1975, and our HFCS is up by 1000 percent" (14). Due to evolving in "lean environments," humans have a genetic weakness for fats and sugars. Although they may not be familiar with the science, the food companies hire strategists to figure out how to market the calorie surplus to people. Kids are the primary demographic, "food companies spend over $10 billion a year selling food brands to kids, and it isn't broccoli they're pushing" (15). This is similar to how cigarettes are often pushed on kids. As a result, the waistlines of Americans are growing. Diet trends are rampant as well as plastic surgery. Just as we modify our food, we modify ourselves.
Not only does the lower nutrition in GM food impact our health, -- obesity, heart disease, high cholesterol, etc. -- it also affects our body image. Elayne A. Saltzberg and Joan C. Chrisler, in their article "Beauty Is the Beast: Psychological Effects of the Pursuit of the Perfect Female Body," examine how body image has changed over the years and how people augment their bodies to fit the contemporary idea of beauty.
- Dieting is a $30-billion-per-year industry.
- Cosmetic Surgery (women) $1.2 billion in 1990.
- Cosmetics $103 billion per month in 1990.
"Woe is us, we over fed, undernourished U.S. citizens" (54).
I hope that was educational. My interest in environmental issues and animal welfare issues can all be traced back to my eating habits and my concern for my health. The way we eat and what we eat directly impacts the environment and the lives of others.
Think about it. Oh, and sign the petition at the bottom of my blog.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

